SORTIE (Scintillation Observations and Response of the Ionosphere to Electrodynamics)
|Launch date||5 Dec 2019|
SORTIE (Scintillation Observations and Response of the Ionosphere to Electrodynamics)
The SORTIE (Scintillation Observations and Response of the Ionosphere to Electrodynamics) mission is a 6U NASA CubeSat mission with team members from ASTRA (Atmospheric and Space Technology Research Associates) of Boulder, CO, AFRL (Air Force Research Laboratory) of Kirtland AFB, NM, UTD (University of Texas, Dallas), COSMIAC (Configurable Space Microsystems Innovations & Applications Center) of Albuquerque, NM, and Boston College of Boston, MA. The overall goal of the mission is to study the complex challenges in discovering the wave-like plasma perturbations in the ionosphere. SORTIE will provide the initial spectrum of wave perturbations which are the starting point for the RF calculation, provide measured electric fields which determine the magnitude of the instability growth rate near where plasma bubbles are generated, and will provide initial observations of the irregularities in plasma density which result from instability growth. 1)
The mission is being funded by a NASA Heliophysics Technology and Instrument Development (H-TIDeS) program grant. The mission is led by ASTRA LLC. The role of the UNM (University of New Mexico) team is to be integrators of the CubeSat. COSMIAC will build the satellite and collect the data from it. 2)
Wave-like perturbations in ionospheric plasma density echo wave-like perturbations in the background neutral atmosphere that couple to the ionosphere through various mechanisms. Winds may mechanically move the ionospheric layer vertically through collisions. Alternatively, neutral atmosphere perturbations may be imprinted on the ionosphere through the dynamo action of winds at low altitudes. No matter what the mechanism, a wave-like perturbation in the ionosphere will result.
In order to connect the plasma density perturbations to wave-like sources it is first necessary to characterize when and where the waves exist statistically. While waves are pervasive features in the F-region of the ionosphere, they rarely exist as continuous wave trains. Figure 1 shows the vertical plasma velocity perturbations, the plasma density perturbations and the plasma density measured continuously around the AFRL sponsored C/NOFS (Communications/Navigation Outage Forecasting System) orbit. These measurements show the wide range of spatial scales and correlations that exist between the plasma density and the plasma velocity. TIDs (Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances) have also been routinely measured in the bottomside ionosphere via HF sounders , and the sounder data confirm the assertion that waves are pervasive features in the F-region ionosphere, but that they rarely exist as continuous wave trains. Like C/NOFS, the HF sounder data also reveals that multiple waves can be present at the same time.
Inspection of the data shown in Figure 1 reveals areas where the correlation between the vertical plasma drift and the plasma density is high. It also shows areas where the spatial correlation is weak. The action of a neutral wind is to drive plasma perpendicular to the magnetic field under the action of a wind dynamo, or to drive plasma parallel to the magnetic field under the action of collisional forces. Plasma motions parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field will affect the plasma density in different ways, depending on geographic location. Near the magnetic equator the action of vertical drift perpendicular to the magnetic field will move plasma into a larger flux tube volume and thus tend to reduce the plasma density in the topside in a signature commonly called the equatorial anomaly. Away from the magnetic equator the upward drift induces diffusive motions parallel to the magnetic field and transport away from the magnetic equator that can locally increase the plasma density. Field-aligned plasma motions induced by neutral winds may move the plasma parallel to the magnetic field, either toward the pole or toward the equator. Equatorward motions are upward and will increase the plasma density above the F-peak, while poleward motions are downward and will tend to decrease the plasma density above the F-peak.
The top panel of Figure 2 schematically shows the associated drifts parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field, and the corresponding changes in the topside plasma density are indicated by the circled arrow. The lower panel shows the density perturbations associated with plasma motions parallel to the magnetic field. Changing the direction of the perpendicular and parallel drifts changes the sign of the associated density perturbation. The point to be emphasized is that the expected relationships between plasma density and plasma drift require that the components of drift parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field must be considered, as well as season, and location with respect to the magnetic equator. Recently the appearance of so-called plasma blobs and their associated plasma dynamics have been investigated in the topside ionosphere. Occurring away from the magnetic equator, an upward drift perpendicular to the magnetic field is invoked. However, the transverse propagation of wave-like drift perturbations has been invoked to account for a phase difference between local maxima in the plasma drift and the plasma density.
Figure 3 shows the plasma density and drift variations observed across a plasma density enhancement in the topside ionosphere. The top panel clearly identifies plasma density enhancements, and the vertical lines indicate the times of simultaneously observed plasma drifts in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field. The second panel shows a peak near 12:23UT in the parallel plasma velocity that is aligned with the plasma density peak at the same time. However, the third panel shows that the peak in the upward drift perpendicular to the magnetic field is displaced to the west of the plasma density peak. This observation serves to emphasize two features. First the upward drift in the southern hemisphere is accompanied by antiparallel downward drift along the magnetic field, as expected. Second the displacement of the peak upward vertical drift perpendicular to the magnetic field and plasma density peak signal the presence of an electrodynamic feature that is propagating to the west such that the ionosphere continues to rise until the propagating feature has passed.
One final attribute of the ionosphere near the F-region peak, is the fact that it has a built-in memory of the previously applied dynamics. Thus, in the topside ionosphere a previously lifted ionosphere will show an increase in the plasma density at a fixed height compared to an ionosphere that is not lifted. Thus the presence of wave-like signatures in the plasma density is possible even in the absence of a corresponding plasma drift feature.
Describing these prevalent signatures of ion-neutral coupling is the key to understanding the role they play in the formation of plasma density gradients that affect radio propagation paths in operational systems, and potentially as the seed for plasma instabilities that can produce intense radio scintillation. However, there is currently no comprehensive atlas of measurements describing the global spatial or temporal distribution of wave-like perturbation in the ionosphere. Thus, the science objectives of the SORTIE mission are:
1) Discover the sources of wave-like plasma perturbations in the F-region ionosphere, and
2) Determine the relative role of dynamo action versus direct mechanical forcing in the formation of wave-like plasma perturbations.
Observations and impact:
An examination of the Figures 2 and 3 indicates the data gathering and analysis procedure that must be followed to establish the dominant mechanisms for production of plasma density perturbations. We first note that while a vertical drift perturbation will produce a corresponding perturbation in the plasma density, the opposite is not true. Thus there can exist plasma density perturbations, indicative of a previous perturbation in the plasma drift that is no longer observed.
An applied velocity perturbation can also “undo” an existing plasma density perturbation and thus the data set must first be divided into two groups: (a) those that show correlations and (b) those that do not. Those that do not show correlations can still provide valuable additions to objective 1. Those with correlations are used to establish the dominant causative mechanisms. As noted in the discussion of Figure 3 it is necessary to first establish a phase delay between the velocity components parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field and the plasma density perturbation. Following this registration we are able to apply the simple rules shown in Figure 2; anti-correlation between the velocity components and positive correlation between the perpendicular drift and the density indicate the dominance of dynamo E x B motion. Positive correlation between upward parallel drifts and plasma density indicate the dominance of mechanical forcing of the plasma along the magnetic field. By these means we will produce closure on the second science objective.
While there have been many disparate studies of ionospheric irregularities and the resulting scintillation on GPS and other radio signals, this is the first time that an ‘atlas’ of ionospheric perturbations will be made for all local times, and multiple seasons for a range of latitudes from the equator to the inclination of the satellite. There are two aspects to equatorial instability: initial seeding, and subsequent evolution of wave perturbations. To date, no investigation has attempted to cover both aspects. SORTIE will provide (a) the initial spectrum of wave perturbations which are the starting point for the RT calculation; (b) measured electric fields which determine the magnitude of the RT growth rate near the region where EPBs are generated; (c) initial observations of irregularities in plasma density which result from RT growth. The proposed work is significant because:
1) It advances our understanding of ionospheric irregularities and the roles of various drivers in their formation
2) It will result in an improved predictive capability of ionospheric irregularities
3) The project anticipates that the proposed work will eventually lead to the production of predictive models that will be able to predict the location and intensity of scintillation on various radio signals.
The selection by NASA of the ICON (Ionospheric Connection Explorer) mission underscores the importance of the coupling between the thermosphere-ionosphere system, and understanding all the factors that lead to variability in the ionosphere. ICON’s goals are to understand the source of strong ionospheric variability, and to quantify the effects of geomagnetic forcing on the ionosphere. SORTIE seeks to advance our understanding of the sources of ionospheric variability in concert with the 2017 flight of the ICON mission.
The SORTIE objectives will be achieved via in-situ ion-drift and plasma density measurements with spatial resolution < 100km. The SORTIE instrument suite will enable the study of the various forcing terms that are critical to understanding the plasma environment. A low to mid latitude near-circular precessing orbit is needed, so that all local times can be covered over the span of the approximately 6 month mission. A portion of the SORTIE science traceability matrix is shown in Table 1.
Orbital inclination is a key consideration in determining mission science return. A low inclination orbit is preferred such that similar magnetic apex heights can be revisited several times each day – however this is not a hard requirement, and it seems unlikely that such a launch opportunity will exist. The mission can be performed near or below station orbit. The mission concept is to sample all local times within 6 months.
Legend to Table 1: The mission goal is to generate an atlas of ionospheric density and vertical drift fluctuations with wavelengths < 100 km at or below the F-region peak.
The SORTIE nanosatellite, supplied by COSMIAC and ASTRA, is designed to provide its ram-facing plasma sensing instruments with a large equipotential surface. The equipotential surface minimizes stray electric fields within a Debye distance of the apertures allowing the trajectories of ions to be traceable from the ambient plasma (minimizes local spacecraft effect on the incoming plasma). The SORTIE spacecraft has sufficient power and telemetry budgets to measure the plasma drifts and densities with a 100% duty cycle. The ram-facing surface normal will be aligned to within 5º of the velocity vector. Post-processing of the science data will determine spacecraft attitude to < 0.05º (1σ, 3-axis). Note that aside from the communication antennas, the SORTIE spacecraft has no deployables. The SORTIE nanosatellite will be inserted into orbit from a 6U deployer. UHF antenna dipoles (located above the mIVM sensor in Figure 5) will be deployed after launch, using a pre-determined commissioning sequence that ensures a safe LV-spacecraft separation distance prior to antenna deployment. The spacecraft will then continue with the commissioning sequence, which will include de-tumble and alignment to the RAM vector. 3)
Spacecraft mass, volume
8 kg, 6U CubeSat (10 cm x 20 cm x 30 cm)
≥ 10 W OAP (Orbit Average Power) at EOL (End of Life)
< 1º, 3-axis stabilized
< 0.003º for 2 axes, < 0.007º for third axis (1σ)
3 Mbit/s downlink (10-5 BER), 9.6 kbit/s uplink (10-6 BER)
The SORTIE nanosatellite was launched on the SpX CRS-19 (Commercial Resupply-19) Dragon mission to the ISS on Thursday, 5 December 2019 (17:29:24 UTC). SpaceX launched its CRS-19 mission from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. 4)
Orbit: Near-circular orbit of the ISS, altitude of ~400 km, inclination = 51.6º, period = 93 minutes.
Secondary payloads: The following ELaNa 25B and 28 technology and demonstration missions were launched on this resupply flight.
• AzTechSat-1. A 1U CubeSat technology demonstration developed by UPAEP (Universidad Popular Autonoma del Estado de Puebla) in Puebla, Mexico, that will use the low-Earth orbit satellite constellation Globalstar for satellite phone and low-speed data communications.
• CryoCube-1. A 3U CubeSat developed at NASA/KSC to perform cryogenic fluid management experiments. The 3U Cubesat features deployable solar arrays, which double as a solar heat shield. A second deployable heat shield will block earth's infrared radiation. Active doors will expose the cryogenic oxygen tank to space during eclipse phases.
• SORTIE (Scintillation Observations and Response of The Ionosphere to Electrodynamics). The SORTIE 6U CubeSat mission is led by ASTRA LLC (Atmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates). The team is composed of ASTRA, COSMIAC, AFRL, University of Texas at Dallas and Boston College. COSMIAC will be the satellite integrator. The mission is to collect data over the course of 6 months, which will allow scientists to describe the distribution of wave-like structures in the plasma density of the ionospheric F-region and to connect these variations to wave sources in the troposphere and in the high latitude thermosphere.
• CIRiS (Compact Infrared Radiometer in Space). A 6U CubeSat of USU (Utah State University), Logan, UT. The objective is to raise the technology readiness level of the new uncooled detector and carbon nanotube source from level 5 to 6, enabling future reduced cost missions to study the hydrologic cycle, characterization of ocean/atmosphere interactions vegetation and land use management. The IR radiometer features a spectral range from 7-13 µm.
• EdgeCube. A 1U CubeSat of Sonoma State University. The objective is to take global measurements of the red edge that monitors a sharp change in leaf reflectance in the range 680 - 750 nm from changes in vegetation chlorophyll absorption and mesophyll scattering due to seasonal leaf phenology or stress. The payload consists of six pairs of photo-sensors and filters that are pointed normal to the spin axis to scan the Earth.
Dragon will join three other spacecraft currently at the station. On 8 December (Sunday), ESA astronaut Luca Parmitano and NASA flight engineer Drew Morgan will man the space station’s Canadian-built robot arm to capture the Dragon supply ship. The robotic arm will position the Dragon spacecraft on the station’s Harmony module, where astronauts will open hatches and begin unpacking the cargo inside the supply ship’s internal compartment.
• February 19, 2020: NanoRacks has completed the Company’s 17th CubeSat deployment mission from the International Space Station using commercially developed and operated hardware. 5)
- Nanoracks’ 17th CubeSat deployment mission included satellites launched to the International Space Station on both Northrop Grumman’s NG-12 flight (launch on 2 November 2019) and the SpaceX CRS-19 (launch 5 December 2019) mission. The deployer packs were then assembled together on orbit by the astronaut crew.
- “The diversity of users on each CubeSat mission is growing with every flight,” says Nanoracks Senior External Payloads Mission Manager, Tristan Prejean. “Our 17th CubeSat mission has satellites built by university students, international space agencies and research institutes, commercial companies reaching the ISS for the first time, and by our friends at NASA. Commercial access to low-Earth orbit is enabling an unprecedented cohort of users from around the world to make discoveries in space – and we are watching this grow year by year.”
- The satellites released on February 19, 2020 and their deployment times were:
a) RadSat-U (Montana State University) – 07:10:01 GMT
b) Phoenix (Arizona State University) – 09:35:00 GMT
c) QARMAN (von Karman Institute) – 11:20:00 GMT
e) CryoCube (Sierra Lobo Incorporated/NASA Kennedy) and AzTechSat-1 (Collaborative program between NASA Ames and Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla [UPAEP] in Mexico) – 12:55:01 GMT
f) SOCRATES (University of Minnesota) – 14:30:00 GMT
g) HARP (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) and ARGUS-02 (Saint Louis University) – 16:00:00 GMT
h) SORTIE (Astra LLC)- 17:40:00 GMT
Sensor Complement (µPLP, mIVM)
The SORTIE sensor suite consists of two components; a µPLP (micro Planar Langmuir Probe) and a mIVM (mini Ion Velocity Meter). The µPLP is provided by AFRL and the mIVM is provided by UTD (University of Texas, Dallas).
µPLP (micro Planar Langmuir Probe)
The µPLP instrument consists of a Langmuir probe, mounting structures, and electronics system. The µPLP design is a miniaturized planar Langmuir probe optimized for use on small satellite platforms and combines lessons learned from the successful 5+ year C/NOFS PLP mission and from the development of the SPLP (SSAEM Planar Langmuir Probe) instrument for the operational FormoSat-7/COSMIC-2 satellite constellation.
< 300 g, < 90 x 85 x 25 mm
200 mW (average), 300 mW (peak)
+12 VDC, +3.3 VDC
FOV (Field of View)
±30º from edge of sensor
mIVM (mini Ion Velocity Meter)
The mIVM is a simple adaptation of similar sensors that have flown on satellite missions starting with Atmosphere Explorer, in the 1970’s and presently on the C/NOFS and DMSP (Defense Meteorological Satellite Program) missions. The mIVM is mounted to view approximately along the spacecraft velocity vector in the ram direction, and performs two functions; the first function is a planar RPA (Retarding Potential Analyzer), which determines the energy distribution of the thermal plasma along the sensor look direction and the second is a planar IDM (Ion Drift Meter), which measures the arrival angle of the thermal plasma with respect to the look direction in two mutually perpendicular planes that are approximately in the local vertical and the local horizontal.
< 750 g, < 98 x 98 x 75 mm
450 mW (average), 500 mW (peak)
+ 5 VDC
±45º from edge of sensor
±0.05º (knowledge), ±10º (control), <0.125/min (slew rate)
The primary SORTIE ground station will be located at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) and utilize a ~ 20 m UHF dish site. SDR (Software Defined Radios) at WFF will be remotely controlled from the MOC (Mission Operations Center) located at COSMIAC/UNM (University of New Mexico) in Albuquerque, NM. The status of the MOC to ground station link is monitored 24/7. The MOC will be led by a mission operations manager, and will perform mission operations planning, command generation, and data acquisition and management. The MOC staff is composed of trained operators who have performed data downlinks from the ISS as well as the University of Michigan RAX CubeSat. SORTIE will communicate in UHF government bands for both uplink and downlink. The radio is a CadetU UHF, capable of 3 Mbit/s FEC (Forward Error Correction) encoded downlink at 460-470 MHz and 9.6 kbit/s uplink (450 MHz). The mission operations system configuration is shown in Figure 8.
1) Geoff Crowley, Chad Fish, Marcin Pilinski, Erik Stromberg, Cheryl Huang, Patrick Roddy, Louise Gentile, James Luke, Rod Heelis, Russel Stoneback, Alonzo Vera, Brian Zufelt, Jeff Love, Wallie Kincaid, John Retterer, ”Scintillation Observations and Response of The Ionosphere to Electrodynamics (SORTIE),” Proceedings of the 30th Annual AIAA/USU SmallSat Conference, Logan UT, USA, August 6-11, 2016, paper: SSC16-VI-3, URL: http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi
2) Kim Delker, ”COSMIAC’s third CubeSat mission will study ionosphere,” UNM, May 13, 2015, URL: http://news.unm.edu/news/cosmiacs-third-cubesat-mission-will-study-ionosphere
3) M. Pilinski, E. Stromberg, C. Fish, G. Crowley, C. Huang, P. Roddy, L. Gentile, R. Heelis, R. Stoneback, A. Vera, C. Kief, B. Zufelt, J. Retterer, ”Scintillation Observations and Response of The Ionosphere to Electrodynamics (SORTIE),” 13th Annual CubeSat Developer's Workshop San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, April20-22, 2016, URL: http://mstl.atl.calpoly.edu/~workshop/archive
4) ”SpaceX Dragon Heads to Space Station With NASA Science,” NASA News, 5 December 2019, URL: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2019-239
5) ”Nanoracks Completes 17th Commercial Space Station CubeSat Deployment Mission,” NanoRacks, 19 February 2020: https://nanoracks.com/nanoracks-completes-17th-commercial-space-station-cubesat-deployment-mission/
The information compiled and edited in this article was provided by Herbert J. Kramer from his documentation of: ”Observation of the Earth and Its Environment: Survey of Missions and Sensors” (Springer Verlag) as well as many other sources after the publication of the 4th edition in 2002. - Comments and corrections to this article are always welcome for further updates (firstname.lastname@example.org)